His body of work is unknown, eclipsed by a single pictorial he undertook for American socialite Teri Shields. InGarry Gross scribbled his name into a dubious footnote in the history of photography by photographing a nude year-old Brooke Shields.
The rest was history — and a rancorous one as that.
Brooke Shields - Wikipedia
On this blog, the post of Brooke Shields which detailed the controversy remains the most visited entryand comments there represent a veritable cross-section of pluralistic viewpoints and range from informed young inane.
But apart from occasional interview, Gross remained in semi-retirement. In the magazine, a ten-year old Brooke brook shown wearing makeup, her glistening body posed naked nude a bathtub.
At the time, Gross was working on a project for publication entitled The Woman shields the Youngin which he wanted to reveal the femininity of shields younger sister juice uncensored by comparing them to adult women. Her mother signed a contract giving Gross full rights to exploit the images of her daughter.
Too Much, Too Young? | arteroma.info
Inhowever, Brooke Shields wanted to prevent further use of these pictures and tried unsuccessfully to buy back the negatives.
A legal battle then began between Shields and Gross with Gross being sued for a million dollars.
Brooke Shields claimed that her mother had agreed to give up her rights for one publication only and that the photographs caused her embarrassment. In addition, they had been published, and would brook be published again, in revues of dubious morality.
How did Brooke Shields get away with full frontal in movie at age 13?
Her lawyers immediately obtained a provisional measure forbidding the use of the pictures nude the end of the trial. Brooke Shields appealed and once again obtained a provisional ban on the use of the photographs.
The actress claimed that the publication of the images caused her distress and embarrassment.